DOORAA | Decision 2701152

OPPOSITION No B 2 701 152 Viacom International Inc., 1515 Broadway, New York, NY 10036-5794, United States of America (opponent), represented by Maucher Jenkins, 26 Caxton Street, London SW1H 0RJ, United Kingdom (professional representative) a g a i n s t Xiamen Yihao Web Science and Technology Co. Ltd., Room 301, Building 1, 12 Wanghai Road, Software Park II, Siming District,

Vossen Group | Decision 2642794 – Linz Textil Holding AG v. Karreveld Holding B.V.

OPPOSITION No B 2 642 794 Linz Textil Holding AG, Wiener Str. 435, 4030 Linz, Austria (opponent), represented by Foglar-Deinhardstein KG, Plankengasse 7, 1010 Wien, Austria (professional representative) a g a i n s t Karreveld Holding B.V., Karreveld 4, 6089NC Heibloem, gemeente Leudal, Netherlands (applicant), represented by Kantoor Mr. Baten B.V., Eendenven 12 5646 JN Einhoven, Netherlands (professional

J&V 1965 | Decision 2608621 – STYLE GROUP BRANDS LIMITED v. GIANLUIGI DAGA

OPPOSITION No B 2 608 621 Style Group Bramds Limited, 32-38 Scrutton Street, London  EC2A 4RQ, United Kingdom (opponent), represented by Groom Wilkes & Wright LLP, The Haybarn, Upton End Farm Business Park, Meppershall Road, Shillington, Hitchin, Hertfordshire SG5 3PF, United Kingdom (professional representative) a g a i n s t Gianluigi Daga, Via XXV Aprile, 4, 47011 Castrocaro

ICONZ | Decision 2709940

OPPOSITION No B 2 709 940 I.C.O.N. Europe, S.L., rúa Amor Ruibal, N° 11 Entlo., 36203 Vigo (Pontevedra), Spain (opponent), represented by Herrero & Asociados, Cedaceros, 1, 28014 Madrid, Spain (professional representative) a g a i n s t emoji company GmbH, Necklenbroicher Strasse 52-54, 40667 Meerbusch, Germany (applicant), represented by Hucke & Schubert, Waidmarkt 11, 50676 Köln, Germany

BERSERKER | Decision 2703570

WIDERSPRUCH Nr. B 2 703 570 Sascha Palosy, Östliche Karl-Friedrich-Str. 65-67, 75175 Pforzheim, Deutschland (Widersprechende), vertreten durch Twelmeier Mommer & Partner, Westliche Karl-Friedrich-Str. 56-68, 75172 Pforzheim, Deutschland (zugelassener Vertreter) g e g e n Harald Bensen, Donau Straße 104, 12043 Berlin, Deutschland und Comdesign, Ledergasse 17, 8232 Merishausen, Schweiz (Anmelder). Am 05/04/2017 ergeht durch die Widerspruchsabteilung die folgende ENTSCHEIDUNG:

ITA DENT | Decision 2707324 – Vita Zahnfabrik H. Rauter GmbH & Co. KG v. DENTAL ITALIA SRL

OPPOSITION No B 2 707 324 Vita Zahnfabrik H. Rauter GmbH & Co. KG, Spitalgasse 3, 79704 Bad Säckingen, Germany (opponent), represented by Dompatent von Kreisler Selting Werner – Partnerschaft von Patentanwälten und Rechtsanwälten mbB, Deichmannhaus am Dom, Bahnhofsvorplatz 1, 50667 Köln, Germany (professional representative) a g a i n s t Dental Italia S.r.l., Strada Sterpara, 98, 04100

SIT | Decision 2770116 – Tapizados Doñana, S. L. v. SUBLEEME SA

OPPOSITION No B 2 770 116 Tapizados Doñana, S. L., Zulema, S/N Pol. IND. Las Baderas, 41840 Sevilla, Spain (opponent), represented by Álvaro Herrera Dávila, Calle Silva, 2 – 1º 1, 28013 Madrid Spain (professional representative) a g a i n s t Subleeme SA, Avenue Louise 235, 1050 Bruxelles, Belgium (applicant), represented by Pronovem Marks Société Anonyme, avenue

ilmiogusto | Decision 2596289

OPPOSITION No B 2 596 289 Weinkontor Freund GmbH, Nienkamp 17, 33829 Borgholzhausen, Germany (opponent), represented by Mai Rechtsanwälte, Lutterstr. 14, 33617 Bielefeld, Germany (professional representative) a g a i n s t Vinocon B.V., Handelsweg 33, 1525 RO Westknollendam, The Netherlands (holder), represented by Onel Trademarks, Leeuwenveldseweg 12, 1382 LX Weesp, The Netherlands (professional representative). On 05/04/2017, the Opposition

HQ | Decision 2590373

OPPOSITION No B 2 590 373 HQ Life AG, Am Marktplatz 7-8, 15806 Zossen, Germany (opponent), represented by Lübeck Kanzlei für Wirtschaft Rechtsanwälte Steuerberater Partnerschaft, Friedensstraße 11, 60311 Frankfurt, Germany (professional representative) a g a i n s t HQ Aviation Ltd, 1 Berkerley Street, London W1J 8DJ, United Kingdom (applicant). On 05/04/2017, the Opposition Division takes the following DECISION: 1.        Opposition

Holy Water | Decision 2053943 – CBM Creative Brands Marken GmbH v. SG Industrie s.r.o.

WIDERSPRUCH Nr. B 2 053 943 CBM Creative Brands Marken GmbH, Kalandergasse 4, 8045 Zürich, Schweiz  (Widersprechende), vertreten durch Bird & Bird LLP, Carl-Theodor-Str. 6, 40213 Düsseldorf, Deutschland) (zugelassener Vertreter) g e g e n SG Industrie s.r.o., Venturska 16, 81101 Bratislava, Slowakei (Anmelderin), vertreten durch Hoyng Rokh Monegier Partnerschaftsgesellschaft von Rechtsanwälten Advocaten und Avocats a la cour mbB,