HP HOLY PREPPY | Decision 1963886 – CBM Creative Brands Marken GmbH v. MERRY-HAT, S.L.

OPPOSITION No B 1 963 886 CBM Creative Brands Marken GmbH, Kalandergasse 4, 8045 Zürich, Switzerland (opponent), represented by Bird & Bird LLP, Carl-Theodor-Str. 6, 40213 Düsseldorf, Germany (professional representative) a g a i n s t Merry-Hat S.L., Avda. Madariaga 45, 48014 Bilbao, Spain (applicant), represented by Leggroup, C/ Campoamor 13, 1º, 28004 Madrid, Spain (professional representative). On 07/04/2017, the Opposition

MAGNA | Decision 2198144 – MAG INSTRUMENT, INC. v. CASTROL LIMITED

OPPOSITION No B 2 198 144 Mag Instrument, Inc., 2001 South Hellman Avenue Ontario, CA 91761, United States (of America) (opponent), represented by Viering, Jentschura & Partner mbB, Grillparzerstraße 14, 81675 München, Germany (professional representative) a g a i n s t Castrol Limited, Technology Centre Whitchurch Hill, Pangbourne Reading RG8 7QR, United Kingdom (applicant), represented by BP Group Trade

paris cardin | Decision 2427600 – Pierre Cardin v. OSAKA GROUP

OPPOSITION No B 2 427 600 Pierre Cardin, 59, rue du Faubourg Saint-Honoré, 75008 Paris, France (opponent), represented by T Mark Conseils, 31, rue Tronchet, 75008 Paris, France (professional representative) a g a i n s t Osaka Group, Opp. Down Town Hotel, Murshid Bazar Deira, Dubai, United Arab Emirates (applicant), represented by Rapisardi Intellectual Property Limited, 2A Collier House 163/169

e | Decision 2347568 – EDISON S.p.A. v. Heat Trace Limited

OPPOSITION No B 2 347 568 Edison S.p.A., Foro Buonaparte, 31, 20121 Milan, Italy (opponent), represented by Notarbartolo & Gervasi S.p.A., Corso di Porta Vittoria, 9, 20122 Milan, Italy (professional representative) a g a i n s t Heat Trace Limited, Meres Edge, Chester Road, Helsby, Frodsham WA6 ODJ, United Kingdom (applicant), represented by Marks & Clerk LLP, 1 New

INEW UNIFIED MOBILE SOLUTIONS | Decision 2322249 – Shenzhen Chuangxingqi Communication Co. v. I-New Unified Mobile Solutions AG

OPPOSITION No B 2 322 249 Shenzhen Chuangxingqi Communication Co., Room 07-08B, Floor 19, block A, Electronic Science and Technology Mansion, No. 2070, Shennan middle Rd, Huaqiangbei street, Futian District, Shenzhen, People’s Republic of China (opponent), represented by Cabinet Armengaud Ainé, 16 rue Gaillon, 75002 Paris, France (professional representative) a g a i n s t I-New Unified Mobile Solutions AG,

LA PLAZUELA | Decision 2326166 – MIGUEL TORRES S.A. v. MAS QUE VINOS GLOBAL, S.L.

OPPOSITION No B 2 326 166 Miguel Torres S.A., Miquel Torres i Carbó, 6, 08720 Vilafranca del Penedès (Barcelona), Spain (opponent), represented by Curell Suñol S.L.P., Via Augusta 21, 08006 Barcelona, Spain (professional representative) a g a i n s t Mas Que Vinos Global S.L., Plazuela de la Iglesia 1, 45311 Dos Barrios (Toledo), Spain (applicant), represented by

PowerTec Energy | Decision 2346651 – GRUPO ISOLUX CORSAN, S.A. v. Norma Lebensmittelfilialbetrieb Stiftung & Co. KG

OPPOSITION No B 2 346 651 Grupo Isolux Corsan, S.A., Calle Caballero Andande, 8, 28021 Madrid, Spain (opponent), represented by J. Lahidalga, Calle Arturo Soria, 243 Dpl. Esc. 4-1º Izd., 28033 Madrid, Spain (professional representative) a g a i n s t Norma Lebensmittelfilialbetrieb Stiftung & Co. KG, Heisterstr. 4, 90441 Nürnberg, Germany (applicant), represented by Betten & Resch Patent-

I KA | Decision 2325622 – ASOCIACION CULTURAL IKASTARI (IKA) v. ADAMS FAMILY PRODUCTIONS

OPPOSITION No B 2 325 622 Asociacion Cultural Ikastari (IKA), Comedias, 14 4, 31001 Pamplona (Navarra), Spain (opponent), represented by Renomark Consulting, S.L.U., Extremadura, 13, Local 2, 28939 Arroyomolinos (Madrid), Spain (professional representative) a g a i n s t Adams Family Productions, 30 Boulevard d’Argenson, 92200 Neuilly Sur Seine, France (applicant), represented by Cabinet Germain & Maureau, 31-33 Rue

Flex | Decision 2273053 – Emhart Glass S.A. v. Envipco Holding N.V.

OPPOSITION No B 2 273 053 Emhart Glass S.A., Hinterbergstr. 22, 6312 Steinhausen, Sweden (opponent), represented by Unit4 IP Rechtsanwalte, Jägerstraße 40, 70174 Stuttgart, Germany (professional representative) a g a i n s t Envipco Holding N.V., Leliegracht 10, 1015 DE Amsterdam, The Netherlands (applicant), represented by Advopat – Patent- und Rechtsanwalte, Theaterstr. 6, 30159 Hannover, Germany (professional representative). On 07/04/2017, the

MYKITA | Decision 2119009 – Nikita Ehf v. Mykita Studio GmbH

OPPOSITION No B 2 119 009 Nikita Ehf, Skipholt 25, Reykjavik 105, Iceland (opponent), represented by Arnason Faktor, Gudridarstig 2-4, Reykjavik 113, Iceland (professional representative) a g a i n s t Mykita Studio GmbH, Ritterstr. 9, 10969 Berlin, Germany (applicant), represented by Merleker & Mielke, Hardenbergstr. 10, 10623 Berlin, Germany (professional representative). On 07/04/2017, the Opposition Division takes the following DECISION: