OPPOSITION No B 2 675 737 ShinHan Art Materials Inc., 452 Sanjiseok-ri, Gyoha-eup, Paju-si, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea (opponent), represented by Javier Ungría López, Avda. Ramón y Cajal, 78, 28043 Madrid, Spain (professional representative) a g a i n s t Conex – Trade, spol. s r.o. Košice, Čermeľská cesta 1, 04001 Košice, Slovakia (applicant), represented by Ivan Belička, Švermova
OPPOSITION No B 778 367 El Corte Inglés, S.A., Hermosilla, 112 28009 Madrid, Spain (opponent), represented by J.M. Toro, S.L.P., Viriato, 56-1ºizda 28010, Madrid, Spain (professional representative) a g a i n s t Lloyd Shoes GmbH, Hans-Hermann-Meyer-Str. 1 27232, Sulingen, Germany (applicant), represented by Bird & Bird LLP, Carl-Theodor-Str. 6 40213 Düsseldorf, Germany (professional representative). On 24/04/2017, the Opposition Division takes the following
OPPOSITION No B 2 689 845 EOS Saunatechnik GmbH, Schneiderstriesch 1, 35759 Driedorf, Germany (opponent), represented by Advotec. Patent- Und Rechtsanwälte, Georg-Schlosser-Str. 6, 35390 Giessen, Germany (professional representative) a g a i n s t Christophe Fiève, 55 bis allée Guy Mocquet, 94170 Le Perreux Sur Marne, France and Morgan Adeneuer, 3 Rue du General de Gaulle, 95220 Herblay, France
OPPOSITION No B 2 712 720 Dedimod SL, C/ Ciudad de Frias 24-32, Nave 8 Pol. Ind. Villaverde, 28021 Madrid, Spain (opponent), represented by Onofre Indalecio Sáez Menchón, Gran Via, 69 -5° Of. 510, 28013 Madrid, Spain (professional representative) a g a i n s t Luca Marchesi, Via Melchiorre Gioia 47, Milan, Italy (applicant). On 24/04/2017, the Opposition Division takes
OPPOSITION No B 2 713 330 Thales Norway AS, Nedre Vollgate 11, 0158 Oslo, Norway (opponent), represented by Marks & Clerk France, Immeuble ‘Visium’, 22, avenue Aristide Briand, 94117 Arcueil Cedex, France (professional representative) a g a i n s t Crypted, Herengracht 12A, 1015 BK Amsterdam, Netherlands (applicant). On 24/04/2017, the Opposition Division takes the following DECISION: 1. Opposition No B 2 713 330 is partially upheld,
OPPOSITION No B 2 744 590 Therabel Pharma NV, Paardeweide 3G, 4824 EH Breda, Netherlands, (opponent), represented by Gevers, Brussels Airport Business Park, Holidaystraat, 5, 1831 Diegem, Belgium (professional representative) a g a i n s t Laboratorios Heel España, s.a.u., Polígono Industrial La Mina, C/ Madroño s/n, 28770 Colmenar Viejo (Madrid), Spain (applicant), represented by Hispamark Patentes y Marcas S.L., Calle Sánchez Barcaiztegui,
OPPOSITION No B 2 700 006 Qing Li, Félix Rodríguez de la Fuente, 81, 1º, 03206 Elche (Alicante), Spain (opponent), represented by Sonia del Valle Valiente, c/ Miguel Angel Cantero Oliva, 5, 53, 28660 Boadilla del Monte (Madrid), Spain (professional representative) a g a i n s t Djeylan Nadjari, Brogatan 16, 17441 Sundbyberg, Sweden (applicant), represented by Vamo Varumärkesombudet AB,
OPPOSITION No B 2 778 226 EKP GmbH, Ebersbergstraße 2, 97422 Schweinfurt, Germany (opponent), represented by Schiedermair Rechtsanwälte Partnerschaftsgesellschaft von Rechtsanwälten und Steuerberatern mbB, Eschersheimer Landstr. 60, 60322 Frankfurt am Main, Germany (professional representative) a g a i n s t Euskadiko Kirol Portua S.A., C/Adriano VI, Nº20, 1º, 01008 Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain (applicant), represented by Consultores Urizar & CIA., Gordóniz,
OPPOSITION No B 2 692 492 Instituto de Educación Superior Intercontinental de la Empresa, S.L., C/ Cantón Claudino Pita, 2, 15300 Betanzos (La Coruña), Spain (opponent), represented by Balder IP Law, S.L., Paseo de la Castellana 93, 28046 Madrid, Spain (professional representative) a g a i n s t Maria Concetta Palmeri, Via Bisagno n. 14, 00100 Roma, Italy (applicant), represented by
OPPOSITION No B 2 722 786 Engelinus Wolthuis, Hoofdweg 68, 9615 AD Kolham, Netherlands (opponent), represented by Merkenbureau Knijff & Partners B.V., Leeuwenveldseweg 12, 1382 LX Weesp, Netherlands (professional representative) a g a i n s t Ghisa Holding B.V., Monte Viso 25, 1060 PE Amsterdam, Netherlands (applicant). On 24/04/2017, the Opposition Division takes the following DECISION: 1. Opposition No B 2 722 786 is upheld for all the