HOKEY POKEY | Decision 009/2016-1

DECISION of the First Board of Appeal of 10 January 2017 In Case R 1009/2016-1   BR IP Holder LLC 130 Royall Street Canton, Massachusetts 2021 United States of America     Opponent / Appellant represented by REDD SOLICITORS LLP, 22 Tudor Street, EC4Y 0AY London, United Kingdom v   Greyleg Investments Limited Myrtle House, Ham Street, Baltonsborough Baltonsborough, Somerset BA68PN

SHINE | Decision 982/2016-5

DECISION of the Fifth Board of Appeal of 10 January 2017 In Case R 982/2016-5   Misfit, Inc. 5 Brookdale Road Salem New Hampshire 03079 United States of America   Applicant / Appellant represented by GRAHAM WATT & CO LLP, St. Botolph’s House, 7-9 St. Botolph’s Road, Sevenoaks TN13 3AJ, United Kingdom v   LG ELECTRONICS INC.

WILD PINK | Decision 087/2015-4

DECISION of the Fourth Board of Appeal of 10 January 2017 In Case R 87/2015-4   Apple and Pear Australia Limited Suite G01 128-132 Jolimont Road EAST MELBOURNE Victoria 3002 Australia   Opponent / Appellant represented by NAUTADUTILH SPRL, Chaussée de la Hulpe, 120, 1000 Bruxelles, Belgium v   Pink Lady America N. 16th Ave. Yakima, Washington

masterpremium | Decision 635/2016-4

DECISION of the Fourth Board of Appeal of 10 January 2017 In Case R 635/2016-4   Affinity Petcare, S.A. Plaça Europa 54-56 08902 L´Hospitalet de Llobregat (Barcelona) Spain   Opponent / Appellant represented by Isern Patentes y Marcas, S.L., Avenida Diagonal, 463 bis, 2° piso, 08036 Barcelona, Spain v   Dieter Harms Glinde 12 A 23843 Bad

BENCHMARKING YOUR WORLD | Decision 419/2016-1

DECISION of the First Board of Appeal of 10 January 2017 In Case R 1419/2016-1   STR, Inc. 735 E. Main St., Hendersonville Tennessee Tennessee 37075 United States of America   Applicant / Appellant represented by FORRESTERS, Rutland House, 148 Edmund Street, Birmingham B3 2JA, United Kingdom   APPEAL relating to European Union trade mark application No 15 175 921 THE FIRST BOARD OF APPEAL composed of

CARDON COSAS NUESTRAS | Decision 981/2016-4

DECISION of the Fourth Board of Appeal of 10 January 2017 In Case R 981/2016-4   TAWNY, S.A. Calle Buenos Aires, 484, piso 2°, Escritorio 10 Montevideo Uruguay     EUTM Proprietor / Appellant represented by SCP Granrut Avocats, 91, rue du Faubourg-Saint-Honoré, F-75008 Paris, France v   DECA Y TECH ENGINEERING ITALIA S.R.L. Via Gabriele Camozzi, 56 I-24121

PIT-STORE RACING MERCHANDISING | Decision 719/2016-4

DECISION of the Fourth Board of Appeal of 10 January 2017 In Case R 719/2016-4   PV Automotive GmbH Theodor-Heuss-Str. 44 47167 Duisburg Germany   Opponent / Appellant represented by WEBER & SAUBERSCHWARZ, Königsallee 62, 40212 Düsseldorf, Germany v   A.R.P. ADVANCED RETAIL PROJECT SPA Viale Parioli 87 00197 Roma Italy   Applicant / Respondent represented by STUDIO FERRARIO

Blue Economy | Decision 0011728

LÖSCHUNG Nr. 11728 C (NICHTIGKEIT)   ZERI Europe – Foundation for a Blue Economy, 19 Vrijwilligerslaan, 1160 Brüssel, Belgien (Antragstellerin), vertreten von Lang & Rahmann Rechtsanwälte, Burggrafenstr. 5, 40545 Düsseldorf, Deutschland (zugelassener Vertreter)   g e g e n   BE Solution & Blue System Design GmbH, Treskowallee 123, 10318 Berlin, Deutschland (Inhaberin der Unionsmarke)    

CALEVO | Decision 2564071 – Calevo GmbH v. Syngenta Limited

WIDERSPRUCH Nr. B 2 564 071   Calevo GmbH, Emsstr.21, 48488 Emsburen, Deutschland (Widersprechende), vertreten durch Krohn Rechtsanwälte, Alsterufer 3, 20354 Hamburg, Deutschland (zugelassener Vertreter)   g e g e n   Syngenta Limited, Syngenta European Regional Centre, Priestley Road Surrey Research Park, Guildford, Surrey GU2 7YH, Vereinigtes Königreich (Anmelderin), vertreten durch INLEX IP Expertise, 5 rue Feydeau, 75002 Paris,