27 – Page 5 – Trademarkers Legal Blog

VITA MAGIC | Decision 2397035 – Water & Salt AG v. Ferenc Ecseri

OPPOSITION No B 2 397 035 Water & Salt AG, Grabenstrasse 25, 6340 Baar, Switzerland (opponent), represented by Weickmann & Weickmann Patentanwälte-Rechtsanwalt PartmbB, Richard-Strauss Str. 80, 81679 München, Germany (professional representative) a g a i n s t Ferenc Ecseri, Bercsényi utca 15, 2700 Cegléd, Hungary (applicant), represented by Zsófia Kacsuk, Üteg u. 11/a, 1139 Budapest, Hungary (professional representative). On 27/07/2017,

LACTAFITT | Decision 2226598 – OMEGA PHARMA INNOVATION & DEVELOPMENT NV v. EVELINE COSMETICS DYSTRYBUCJA sp. z o.o. s.k.

OPPOSITION No B 2 226 598 Omega Pharma Innovation & Development NV, Venecoweg 26, 9810 Nazareth, Belgium (opponent), represented by Altius, Avenue du Port 86 C B414, 1000 Brussels, Belgium (professional representative) a g a i n s t Eveline Cosmetics Brand Concept Development Sp. z o.o., ul. Wierzbowa nr 18 90-245 Łódź, Poland (applicant), represented by Kancelaria Patentowa

LABOCARE | Decision 2764267

OPPOSITION No B 2 764 267 Jiri Stratil, Alte Landstr. 11, 6314 Unterägeri, Switzerland (opponent), represented by Ter Meer Steinmeister & Partner Patentanwälte MBB, Nymphenburger Straße 4, 80335 Munich, Germany (professional representative) a g a i n s t L&P Cosmetic Co. Ltd., B101, Wooree Venture Town 466, Gangseo-Ro Gangseo-Gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea (holder), represented by Grosse Schumacher Knauer

matts | Decision 2200379 – Lidl Stiftung & Co. KG v. wageswiese GmbH

WIDERSPRUCH Nr. B 2 200 379 Lidl Stiftung & Co. KG, Stiftsbergstraße 1, 74172 Neckarsulm, Deutschland (Widersprechende), vertreten durch Weickmann & Weickmann Patentanwälte – Rechtsanwälte PartmbB, Richard-Strauss Str. 80, 81679 München, Deutschland (zugelassener Vertreter) g e g e n wageswiese GmbH, Kartäuserstraße 60, 79102 Freiburg, Deutschland (Anmelderin), vertreten durch Kurz Pfitzer Wolf& Partner Rechtsanwälte mbB, Königstr. 40, 70173 Stuttgart,

IMPERIO IBÉRICO GRAN BELUGA | Decision 2440124 – Scillard Investments Limited v. AGRO-ROCA VALLES, S.L.

OPPOSITION No B 2 440 124 Scillard Investments Limited, Michail Psellou, 5, Viom. Per. Agiou Athanasiou, Linopetra, 4105 Limassol, Cyprus (opponent), represented by Hogan Lovells, Avenida Maisonnave 22, 03003 Alicante, Spain (professional representative) a g a i n s t Agro-Roca Valles, S.L., C/ La Noria, 13 nave 5, 08430 La Roca del Vallés (Barcelona), Spain (applicant), represented by Pons Patentes y

PURESSENTIEL BEBE PUR | Decision 2571852 – CILAG GMBH INTERNATIONAL v. Puressentiel TM

OPPOSITION No B 2 571 852 Cilag Gmbh International, Gubelstrasse 34, 6300 Zug, Switzerland (opponent), represented by Müller Schupfner & Partner Patent- und Rechtsanwaltspartnerschaft mbB, Bavariaring 11, 80336 Munich, Germany (professional representative) a g a i n s t Puressentiel TM, 28 place de la Gare, 1616 Luxembourg (applicant), represented by Office Freylinger S.A., 234, Route d'Arlon B.P.

basicura | Decision 2547233 – BASIC Aktiengesellschaft Lebensmittelhandel v. goji.bio UG

WIDERSPRUCH Nr. B 2 547 233 Basic Aktiengesellschaft Lebensmittelhandel, Richard-Strauss-Str. 48/1, 81677 München, Deutschland (Widersprechende), vertreten durch SKW Schwarz Rechtsanwälte, Wittelsbacherplatz 1, 80333 München, Deutschland (zugelassener Vertreter) g e g e n goji.bio UG, Lauenbühlstraße 59, 88161 Lindenberg, Deutschland (Anmelderin). Am 27/07/2017 ergeht durch die Widerspruchsabteilung die folgende ENTSCHEIDUNG: 1. Der Widerspruch Nr. B 2 547 233 wird in seiner Gesamtheit zurückgewiesen. 2. Die Widersprechende trägt die Kosten. BEGRÜNDUNG: Die Widersprechende legte Widerspruch

MORTEX | Decision 2556804 – GRUPO PUMA S.L. v. BEAL INTERNATIONAL

OPPOSITION No B 2 556 804 Grupo Puma S.L., C/Conrado del Campo, 2. P.I. Trévenez, 29590 Málaga, Spain (opponent) a g a i n s t Beal International, Rue des Bailleries, 4, 5081 Meux, Belgium (applicant), represented by Marc Isgour, Rue de Florence, 13, 1000 Bruxelles, Belgium (professional representative). On 27/07/2017, the Opposition Division takes the following DECISION: 1. Opposition No B 2 556 804

BODY GUARD | Decision 2481219 – Dansk Supermarked A/S v. Golden Lady Company S.p.A.

OPPOSITION No B 2 481 219 Dansk Supermarked A/S, Rosbjergvej 33, 8220 Brabrand, Denmark (opponent), represented by Bech-Bruun Law Firm, Værkmestergade 2, 8000 Århus C, Denmark (professional representative) a g a i n s t Golden Lady Company S.p.A., Via Leopardi, 3/5, 46043 Castiglione delle Stiviere (MN), Italy (applicant), represented by Barzano' & Zanardo Milano S.p.A., Via Borgonuovo, 10, 20121 Milano,

THEQUBE | Decision 2470691 – GROUPE CANAL+, SA v. GREENLAND HOTEL MANAGEMENT INTERNATIONAL GROUP LIMITED

OPPOSITION n° B 2 470 691 Groupe Canal+, SA, 1, place du Spectacle, 92130 Issy Les Moulineaux, France (opposante), représentée par Brandstorming, 11, rue Lincoln, 75008 Paris, France (mandataire agréé) c o n t r e Greenland Hotel Management International Group Limited, Flat/Rm 1701 17/F Greenfield Tower Concordia Plaza 1 Science Museum Rd, Kl Région Administrative spéciale de Hong