20 – Page 3 – Trademarkers Legal Blog

DOT SPA | Decision 2577875 – S.A. Spa Monopole, Compagnie fermière de Spa, en abrégé S.A. Spa Monopole N.V. v. Dot Cosmetica SA

OPPOSITION No B 2 577 875 S.A. Spa Monopole, Compagnie fermière de Spa, en abrégé S.A. Spa Monopole N.V., Rue Laporte, 34, 4900 Spa, Belgium (opponent), represented by Gevers, Brussels Airport Business Park, Holidaystraat, 5, 1831 Diegem, Belgium (professional representative) a g a i n s t Dot Lifestyle SA, Via alla Campagna 2ª, 6900 Lugano, Switzerland (applicant), represented by ADV

veggie meat | Decision 2538703 – Günter Puttkammer Fleischwaren Spezialitäten GmbH v. VeggieMeat GmbH

WIDERSPRUCH Nr. B 2 538 703 Günter Puttkammer Fleischwaren Spezialitäten GmbH, Industriestr. 2, 19205 Gadebusch ,Deutschland (Widersprechende), vertreten durch Niedmers Jaeger Köster, Van-der-Smissen-Str. 3, 22767 Hamburg ,Deutschland (zugelassener Vertreter) g e g e n VeggieMeat GmbH, Mühldorferstr. 10, 84549 Engelsberg, Deutschland (Anmelderin), vertreten durch Christian Ballke, Sophienstr. 5, 80333 München, Deutschland (zugelassener Vertreter). Am 20.09.2017 ergeht durch die Widerspruchsabteilung

NANACOCO | Decision 2326190 – CHANEL (Société par Actions Simplifiée) v. Annie International, Inc.

OPPOSITION n° B 2 326 190 Chanel, Société par Actions Simplifiée, 135, avenue Charles de Gaulle, 92200 Neuilly sur Seine Cédex, France (opposante), représentée par Sylvie Harding, 135, avenue Charles de Gaulle, 92521 Neuilly sur Seine Cédex, France (mandataire agréé) c o n t r e Annie International Inc., 500 Church Road, North Wales Pennsylvania 19454-4106, États-Unis d’Amérique (demanderesse),

ROMBIT CONNECTING DIGITAL MINDS | Decision 2425596 – combit Software GmbH v. ROMBIT

OPPOSITION No B 2 425 596 Combit Software GmbH, Untere Laube 30, 78462 Konstanz, Germany (opponent), represented by Patentanwälte und Rechtsanwalt Weiss, Arat & Partner mbB, Zeppelinstr. 4, 78234 Engen, Germany (professional representative) a g a i n s t Rombit N.V., Frankrijklei 115, 2000 Antwerpen, Belgium (applicant), represented by Patrick Theunis, Langbosweg 19, 2550 Kontich, Belgium (professional representative).

GIORGIO ARMANI LE SAC 11 | Decision 2558842 – Felipe Domingo Asuncion v. GIORGIO ARMANI S.p.A., Milan, Swiss Branch Mendrisio

OPPOSITION No B 2 558 842 Felipe Domingo Asunción, Calle Dr. Cortezo, 8, 28012 Madrid, Spain (opponent), represented by Herrero & Asociados, Cedaceros, 1, 28014 Madrid, Spain (professional representative) a g a i n s t Giorgio Armani S.P.A., Via Borgonuovo, 11, 20121 Milano, Italy (applicant), represented by Jacobacci & Partners S.P.A., Corso Emilia, 8, 10152 Torino, Italy (professional

LE SAC 11 | Decision 2520917 – Felipe Domingo Asuncion v. GIORGIO ARMANI S.p.A., Milan, Swiss Branch Mendrisio

OPPOSITION No B 2 520 917 Felipe Domingo Asunción, Calle Dr. Cortezo, 8, 28012 Madrid, Spain (opponent), represented by Herrero & Asociados, Cedaceros, 1, 28014 Madrid, Spain (professional representative) a g a i n s t Giorgio Armani S.P.A., Via Borgonuovo, 11, 20121 Milano, Italy (applicant), represented by Jacobacci & Partners S.P.A., Corso Emilia, 8, 10152 Torino, Italy (professional