AGUAMARINA | Decision 2705567

OPOSICIÓN Nº B 2 705 567 Bodegas Cooperativas de Alicante, Coop. V. Bocopa, Autovía Alicante-Madrid, km. 39, 03610 Petrer (Alicante), España (parte oponente), representada por Wolke, Patentes y Marcas, Calle Alejandro Ferrant, 9, 28045 Madrid, España (representante profesional) c o n t r a Miguel Torres, S.A., C/ Miquel Torres i Carbó 6, 08720 Vilafranca del Penedès (Barcelona), España

CitiLight | Decision 2807082

OPPOSITION No B 2 807 082 Citizen Electronics Co. Ltd., 23-1, Kamikurechi 1-chome, Fujiyoshida-shi, Yamanashi  403-0001, Japan (opponent), represented by Elzaburu S.L.P., Miguel Angel, 21, 28010 Madrid, Spain (professional representative) a g a i n s t CitiLight A/S, Arresoevej 15, 8240 Risskov, Denmark (applicant). On 18/08/2017, the Opposition Division takes the following DECISION: 1.        Opposition No B 2 807 082 is partially upheld, namely

FIDES | Decision 2783184

OPPOSITION No B 2 783 184 Trade Fides, a.s., Dornych 129/57, 617 00 Brno, Czech Republic (opponent), represented by Propatent – Patent. Známk. Graf. Kancelář, Pod Pekařkou 107/1, 147 00 Podolí, Praha 4, Czech Republic (professional representative) a g a i n s t Spühl GmbH, Grüntalstraße 23, 9300 Wittenbach, Switzerland (applicant), represented by Kraus & Weisert, Thomas-Wimmer-Ring 15, 80539 München, Germany (professional representative). On

Beelorcia | Decision 2703125

OPOSICIÓN Nº B 2 703 125 Kukuxumusu Ideas, S.L., C/ Monte Malkaiz, 28, 31620 Gorraiz (Navarra), España  (parte oponente), representada por AB Asesores, C/ Bravo Murillo, 219 – 1º B, 28020 Madrid, España (representante profesional) c o n t r a Mikel Urmeneta Otsoa, C/ Navas de Tolosa 5, Pamplona, España (solicitante), representado por Miguel Troncoso Ferrer, 480 Avenue Louise,

dgpower | Decision 2741711

OPPOSITION No B 2 741 711 Shenzhen Win-Top Electronic Tech Co., Ltd., Room 1005 of 10th Floor, Bldg.2, Shang henglang New Industry Zone, Tongsheng Community, Dalang Subdistrict, Bao'an District, Shenzhen, People's Republic of China (opponent), represented by Arnason Faktor, Gudridarstig 2-4, Reykjavik  113, Island (professional representative) a g a i n s t Tigo Bateries S.L., C/ Infante Don

Cyber Drive | Decision 2720251

OPPOSITION No B 2 720 251 Wittenstein SE, Walter-Wittenstein-Str. 1, 97999 Igersheim, Germany (opponent), represented by Zimmermann & Partner Patentanwälte mbB, Josephspitalstr. 15 80331 München, Germany (professional representative) a g a i n s t Rozum Robotics Inc., 723 S Casino Center Blvd, 2nd fl, Las Vegas, Nevada 89101-6716, United States of America (applicant), represented by DR. Emil Benatov & Partners, Asen Peykov Str.

C6 | Decision 2759150

OPPOSITION No B 2 759 150 Hamilton Germany GmbH, Fraunhoferstr. 17, 82152 Planegg, Germany (opponent), represented by Ruttensperger Lachnit Trossin Gomoll Patent- und Rechtsanwälte Partnerschaftsgesellschaft mbB, Arnulfstrasse 58, 80335 München, Germany (professional representative) a g a i n s t Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd., Administration Building Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd., Bantian, Longgang District, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518129, People’s Republic of China (applicant),

Travelpack | Decision 2120361 – Travelpack Marketing & Leisure Services Limited v. Traffics Softwaresysteme für den Tourismus GmbH

OPPOSITION No B 2 120 361 Travelpack Marketing & Leisure Services Limited, 523 High Road, Wembley (Middlesex)  HA0 2DH, United Kingdom (opponent), represented by Joanne Claire Lazenby, 28 Mornington Terrace, London NW1 7RS, United Kingdom (professional representative) a g a i n s t Traffics Softwaresysteme für den Tourismus GmbH, Alboinstraße 36-42, 12103 Berlin, Germany (applicant), represented by Tobias

MORILIVE | Decision 2758467

WIDERSPRUCH Nr. B 2 758 467 Henkel AG & Co. KGaA, Henkelstr. 67, 40589 Düsseldorf, Deutschland (Widersprechende) g e g e n Denis Raphael, Wangern 4, 23999 Insel Poel, Deutschland (Anmelder), vertreten durch Urs Norman Straube, Schatzenberg 2, 77871 Renchen, Deutschland (zugelassener Vertreter). Am 18.08.2017 ergeht durch die Widerspruchsabteilung die folgende ENTSCHEIDUNG: 1.        Dem Widerspruch Nr. B 2 758 467 wird teilweise stattgegeben, und