SPECTRUM IMPORT EXPORT LIMITED | Decision 2399866

OPPOSITION No B 2 399 866 Hercules LLC, 500 Hercules Road, Wilmington, Delaware 19808, United States of America, (opponent), represented by Kutzenberger Wolff & Partner, Theodor-Heuss-Ring 23, 50668 Köln, Germany (professional representative) a g a i n s t Spectrum Import Export Limited, suite 925A, Europort, Gibraltar, Gibraltar (holder), represented by Jeck & Fleck, Klingengasse 2/1, 71665 Vaihingen/Enz, Germany (professional

CC CAPITAN CHROME | Decision 2430505 – Country Casuals Limited v. GIOIELLERIA CURNIS S.r.l.

OPPOSITION No B 2 430 505 Border I.P. Limited, Unit A, Queens Drive, Kingmoor Park South, Carlisle CA6 4SB, United Kingdom (opponent), represented by Page White & Farrer, Bedford House, John Street, London WC1N 2BF, United Kingdom (professional representative) a g a i n s t Gioielleria Curnis S.r.l., Via Zambonate 55/57, 24122 Bergamo, Italy (applicant), represented by Biesse S.R.L., Via

QI GONG TAO | Decision 2401365 – Joy Sportswear GmbH v. Dipl.-Psych. Harald Röder, Psychotherapeutische Praxis

WIDERSPRUCH Nr. B 2 401 365 Joy Sportswear GmbH, Bräunleinsberg 16, 91242 Ottensoos, Deutschland (Widersprechende), vertreten durch Intellectual Property IP-Götz Patent- und Rechtsanwälte, Königstr. 70, Am Literaturhaus, 90402 Nürnberg, Deutschland (zugelassener Vertreter) g e g e n Dipl.-Psych. Harald Röder, Psychotherapeutische Praxis, Hallplatz 23, 90402 Nürnberg, Deutschland (Anmelderin), vertreten durch Matthias Negendanck, Rennweg 60-62, 90489 Nürnberg, Deutschland (zugelassener Vertreter).

K MENU | Decision 2390725 – Karlovarská Korunní s.r.o. v. Ruokakesko Oy

OPPOSITION No B 2 390 725 Karlovarská Korunní s.r.o., Stráž nad Ohří 77, 36274, Stráž nad Ohří, Czech Republic (opponent), represented by Propatent – Patent, Známk, Graf, Kancelář, Pod Pekařkou 107/1, 147 00, Podolí, Prague 4, Czech Republic (professional representative) a g a i n s t Kesko Oyj, Sörnäistenkatu 2, 00580 Helsinki, Finland (applicant), represented by Borenius Attorneys Ltd,

QI GONG TAO INSTITUT | Decision 2401332 – Joy Sportswear GmbH v. Dipl.-Psych. Harald Röder, Psychotherapeutische Praxis

WIDERSPRUCH Nr. B 2 401 332 Joy Sportswear GmbH, Bräunleinsberg 16, 91242 Ottensoos, Deutschland (Widersprechende), vertreten durch Intellectual Property IP-Götz Patent- und Rechtsanwälte, Königstr. 70, Am Literaturhaus, 90402 Nürnberg, Deutschland (zugelassener Vertreter) g e g e n Dipl.-Psych. Harald Röder, Psychotherapeutische Praxis, Hallplatz 23, 90402 Nürnberg, Deutschland (Anmelderin), vertreten durch Matthias Negendanck, Rennweg 60-62, 90489 Nürnberg, Deutschland (zugelassener Vertreter).

Leview | Decision 2637679

OPPOSITION No B 2 637 679 G+J Holding GmbH, Parkring 12, 1010 Wien, Austria (opponent), represented by Harte-Bavendamm Rechtsanwälte Partnerschaftsgesellschaft mbB, Am Sandtorkai 77, 20457 Hamburg, Deutschland (professional representative) a g a i n s t Le Shi Internet Information & Technology (Beijing) Corporation, Room 6184, 6th Floor, Building 19, No. 68 Xueyuan South Road, Haidian District, Beijing, People´s Republic

AX TECHNOLOGY | Decision 2435439 – Wheeler & Clinch Limited v. AX Technology Sp. z o.o. Spólka komandytowa

OPPOSITION No B 2 435 439 Wheeler & Clinch Limited, 75-99 Nathan Way, West Thamesmead Business Park, London SE28 0BQ, United Kingdom (opponent), represented by Forresters, Sherborne House, 119-121 Cannon Street, London  EC4N 5AT, United Kingdom (professional representative) a g a i n s t AX Technology Sp. z o.o. Spólka komandytowa, ul. Modra 62, 71220 Szczecin, Poland (applicant), represented