Robo KM | Decision 2709676 – CKL Holdings N.V. v. CHANGZHOU SKIRDA SOFTWARE CO., LTD

OPPOSITION No B 2 709 676 CKL Holdings N.V., Klosterstr. 28-30, 4700 Eupen, Belgium (opponent) a g a i n s t Changzhou Skirda Software Co. Ltd, Room 801, Building 5, Times Business Square, Xinbei District, Changzhou City 213022, People’s Republic of China (applicant), represented by Protecmark, Rey Don Jaime, 2-2, 03600 Elda (Alicante), Spain (professional representative). On 16/06/2017, the Opposition Division

Chilli Mili | Decision 2726993 – Raps GmbH & Co KG v. Mr. Hash Piotr Terlikowski

OPPOSITION No B 2 726 993 Raps GmbH & Co KG, Adalbert-Raps-Str. 1, 95326 Kulmbach, Germany (opponent), represented by Hofstetter, Schurack & Partner, Patent- und Rechtsanwaltkanzlei, PartG mbB, Balanstrasse 57, 81541 München, Germany (professional representative) a g a i n s t Mr Hash Piotr Terlikowski, Ul. Opolska 88, Walidrogi, 46-050 Tarnów Opolski (applicant), represented by Olga Welcer-Hrycaj, Ul. Prószkowska

WALDEK | Decision 2764390

OPPOSITION No B 2 764 390 Mª Esther Gómez Inaraja, Calle la Luna, 4, 40180 Brieva, Spain (opponent), represented by Marks & US, Marcas y Patentes, Ibañez de Bilbao 26, 8º dcha, 48009 Bilbao (Vizcaya), Spain (professional representative) a g a i n s t Oppermann London Ltd, 21 Clerkenwell Green, London, London City of, EC1R 0DX United Kingdom (applicant) On 16/06/2017,

Villa-Lotus | Decision 2766809 – LOTUS BAKERIES (naamloze vennootschap) v. Henan Lotus Health Industry Limited by Share Ltd

OPPOSITION No B 2 766 809 Lotus Bakeries (Naamloze Vennootschap), Gentstraat 1, 9971 Lembeke, Belgium (opponent), represented by Novagraaf Belgium S.A./N.V., Chaussée de la Hulpe 187, 1170 Bruxelles / Brussel, Belgium (professional representative) a g a i n s t Henan Lotus Health Industry Limited By Share Ltd, No.18 Lianhua Boulevard, Xiangcheng City, Henan, People’s Republic of China (applicant),

ALDO | Decision 2705781

WIDERSPRUCH Nr. B 2 705 781 Aldi GmbH & Co. KG, Burgstr. 37, 45476 Mülheim/Ruhr, Deutschland (Widersprechende), vertreten durch Schmidt, von der Osten & Huber Rechtsanwälte Steuerberater Partnerschaft mbB, Haumannplatz 28, 45130 Essen, Deutschland (zugelassener Vertreter) g e g e n Lonza Inc., 90 Boroline Road, Allendale New Jersey 07401, Vereinigte Staaten von Amerika (Anmelderin), vertreten durch Bardehle Pagenberg

Spring | Decision 2752916 – Spring International GmbH v. Guangdong Huayi Plumbing Fittings Industry Co., Ltd.

OPPOSITION No B 2 752 916 Spring International GmbH, Höhscheider Weg 29, 42699 Solingen, Germany (opponent), represented by Dompatent von Kreisler Selting Werner – Partnerschaft von Patentanwälten und Rechtsanwälten mbB, Deichmannhaus am Dom, Bahnhofsvorplatz 1, 50667 Köln, Germany (professional representative) a g a i n s t Guangdong Huayi Plumbing Fittings Industry Co., Ltd., No.1, Baishitou Industrial Development Zone, Yueshan

VIMVIP | Decision 2748898 – Vim Solution GmbH v. ShenZhen VIMVIP Technology Co., Ltd.

OPPOSITION No B 2 748 898 Vim Solution GmbH, Im Eck 5, 79199 Kirchzarten, Germany (opponent), represented by Unverzagt Von Have Rechtsanwälte Partnerschaftsgesellschaft mbB, Heimhuder Straße 71, 20148 Hamburg, Germany (professional representative) a g a i n s t ShenZhen VIMVIP Technology Co. Ltd., Room C22, 3rd Floor, Hedian Building, Shennan Rd, Yuan Ling Street, Futian Qu, Shenzhen City, Guangdong Province,

fair4pets | Decision 2701533 – VERITAS-Tiernahrung Dienstleistungsgesellschaft mbH v. Robert Schütz

WIDERSPRUCH Nr. B 2 701 533 VERITAS-Tiernahrung Dienstleistungsgesellschaft mbH, Robert-Bosch-Str. 4, 69509 Mörlenbach, Deutschland (Widersprechende) g e g e n Robert Schütz, Kirchenackerweg 10, 2604 Theresienfeld, Österreich (Anmelder). Am 16/06/2017 ergeht durch die Widerspruchsabteilung die folgende ENTSCHEIDUNG: 1.        Dem Widerspruch Nr. B 2 701 533 wird teilweise stattgegeben, und zwar für die folgenden angefochtenen Waren und Dienstleistungen: Klasse 3:        Reinigungs- und Duftpräparate; Tierpflegemittel. Klasse 5:        Diätetische Präparate und

Lotus – Villa | Decision 2766858 – LOTUS BAKERIES (naamloze vennootschap) v. Henan Lotus Health Industry Limited by Share Ltd

OPPOSITION No B 2 766 858 Lotus Bakeries (Naamloze Vennootschap), Gentstraat 1, 9971 Lembeke, Belgium (opponent), represented by Novagraaf Belgium S.A./N.V., Chaussée de la Hulpe 187, 1170 Bruxelles / Brussel, Belgium (professional representative) a g a i n s t Henan Lotus Health Industry Limited By Share Ltd, No.18 Lianhua Boulevard, Xiangcheng City, Henan, People’s Republic of China (applicant),

ORTHO 7 | Decision 2742966

OPPOSITION No B 2 742 966 Dentaurum GmbH & Co. KG, Turnstr. 31, 75228 Ispringen, Germany  (opponent), represented by Hoeger, Stellrecht & Partner Patentanwälte Mbb, Uhlandstr. 14c, 70182 Stuttgart, Germany (professional representative) a g a i n s t Pierre-Jean Leoni, 9 rue Louis Blanc Résidence Samblancay, 75010 Paris, France  (applicant), represented by Benjamin Dewhurst, 175 boulevard Malesherbes, 75017