COLOREX | Decision 2741059

OPPOSITION No B 2 741 059 Colorex Comércio e Desenvolvimento de Produtos Ltda., Rua Deputado Vicente Penido, No. 6, Vila Guilherme, São Paulo 02064-120, Brasil (opponent), represented by Schoppe, Zimmermann, Stöckeler, Zinkler, Schenk & Partner mbB Patentanwälte, Radlkoferstr. 2, 81373 München, Germany (professional representative) a g a i n s t Pebeo (Société Anonyme), Zone d'Entreprises, Avenue du Pic de Bretagne,

L ´Amor | Decision 2748179

OPOSICIÓN Nº B 2 748 179 Rives Pitman S.A., Aurora,4, 11500 Puerto de Santa Maria (Cádiz),  España (parte oponente), representada por Rodolfo de la Torre S.L., C/ San Pablo, nº15-3º, 41001 Sevilla, España (representante profesional) c o n t r a Antonio Catino, AV. Guadalupe # 6493-B, Col. Chapalita Inn, Zapopan Jalisco 45010,   México (solicitante), representado por Flavio

STAR CLOUD | Decision 2771270

OPPOSITION No B 2 771 270 Finanzauto SA., Avenida de Madrid, 43, 28500 Arganda del Rey, Spain (opponent), represented by Alesci Naranjo Propiedad Industrial SL, Calle Paseo de la Habana 200, 28036 Madrid, Spain (professional representative) a g a i n s t Star Micronics CO. LTD., 20-10 Nakayoshida, Suruga-Ku, Shizuoka-shi, Shizuoka  422-8654, Japan (holder), represented by Durán –

atp | Decision 2052846 – Luis Angel Moreno Garcia v. ATP Industries Group Limited

OPPOSITION No B 2 052 846 Luis Angel Moreno Garcia, Carretera de Irun, Km. 6, 31194 Arre (Navarra), Spain (opponent), represented by AB Asesores, Calle Bravo Murillo, 219 – 1º B, 28020 Madrid, Spain (professional representative) a g a i n s t ATP Industries Group Limited, Cannock Wood Industrial Estate, Cannock Wood Street Cannock Staffordshire WS12 0PL, United

PinStyle | Decision 2069832 – Pinterest, Inc. v. Maryme GMBH

OPPOSITION No B 2 069 832 Pinterest, Inc., 808 Brannan Street, San Francisco, California 94103, United States of America (opponent), represented by Baker & McKenzie LLP, 100 New Bridge Street, London EC4V 6JA, United Kingdom (professional representative) a g a i n s t Maryme GmbH, Invalidenstraße 115, 10115 Berlin, Germany (applicant), represented by (F200) Asg Rechtsanwälte Gmbh, Friedrichstr. 200,

Saldoro Natursprünglich rein URMEERSALZ | Decision 2357922 – Thomas Krause v. esco – european salt company GmbH & Co. KG

WIDERSPRUCH Nr. B 2 357 922 Jens Naumann, Köllnische Str. 30, 12439 Berlin, Deutschland (Widersprechender) g e g e n esco – european salt company GmbH & Co. KG, Landschaftstr. 1, 30159 Hannover, Deutschland (Anmelderin), vertreten durch K+S Aktiengesellschaft, Stefan Dressel, Bertha-von Suttner Str. 7, 34131 Kassel, Deutschland (angestellter Vertreter). Am 28/06/2017 ergeht durch die Widerspruchsabteilung die folgende ENTSCHEIDUNG:

SHOWROOM | Decision 2218546 – E-GAB, Naamloze Vennootschap v. SHOWROOM Sp. z o.o.

OPPOSITION No B 2 218 546 E-GAB, Naamloze Vennootschap, Assesteenweg 96, 1740 Ternat, Belgium (opponent), represented by Gevers, Brussels Airport Business Park, Holidaystraat 5, 1831 Diegem, Belgium (professional representative) a g a i n s t Showroom Sp. z o.o., Włoska 10, 00-777 Warsaw, Poland (applicant), represented by Kancelaria Prawno-Patentowa Anna Bełz, Północna 6/24, 20-064 Lublin, Poland (professional representative).

WELLVITA | Decision 2566027 – Bayern Tourismus Marketing GmbH v. WELLVITA ApS

OPPOSITION No B 2 566 027 Bayern Tourismus Marketing GmbH, Arabellastraße 17, 81925 München (Bayern), Germany (opponent), represented by Abitz & Partner Patentanwälte mbB, Arabellastraße 17, 81925 München, Germany (professional representative) a g a i n s t Wellvita ApS, Energivej 18, 6700 Esbjerg, Denmark (applicant), represented by Dahl Advokatfirma, Dokken 10, 6700 Esbjerg, Denmark (professional representative). On 28/06/2017, the