(Trade mark without text) | Decision 0012326

CANCELLATION No 12 326 C (INVALIDITY) WallMax S.r.l., Viale L. Majno, 5, 20122 Milan, Italy (applicant), represented by Luigi Goglia, Via Privata Cesare Battisti, 2, 20122 Milan, Italy (professional representative) a g a i n s t Roxtec AB, Rombvägen 2, 371 23 Karlskrona, Sweden (EUTM proprietor), represented by Advokatbyrån Gulliksson AB, Carlsgatan 3, 203 12 Malmö, Sweden

GFV | Decision 0011980

CANCELLATION No 11 980 C (REVOCATION) CKL Holdings N.V., Leeuwenstraat 4, 2000 Antwerp, Belgium, (applicant), a g a i n s t Honda Motor Co., Ltd., 1-1, Miniami-Aoyama 2-chome, Minato-Ku, Tokyo 107-8556, Japan (EUTM proprietor), represented by Mitscherlich, Patent-Und Rechtsanwälte, Partmbb, Sonnenstrasse 33, 80331 Munich, Germany (professional representative). On 14/03/2017, the Cancellation Division takes the following DECISION 1.        The

COLOURBLIND | Decision 0011901

CANCELLATION No 11 901 C (INVALIDITY) Future Factory Limited, c/o Westgarth Financial Management Limited, 36 Westgarth Avenue, Colinton, Edinburgh EH13 0BD, United Kingdom (applicant), represented by Bond Dickinson LLP, 1 Whitehall Riverside, Leeds LS1 4BN, United Kingdom (professional representative) a g a i n s t RSVP Design Limited, 2 Darluith Park, Brookfield, Johnstone, Renfrewshire PA5 8DD, United

D’ARISTI XTABENTÚN Licor de Anís y Miel de Abeja | Decision 2027228 – ARESTI CHILE WINE, S.A. v. CASA D’ARISTI S.A. DE C.V.

OPOSICIÓN Nº B 2 027 228 Arsti Chile Wine S.A., Avda. Santa María, Nº 6350 Vitacura, Santiago, Chile (parte oponente), representada por Esquivel, Martin, Pinto & Sessano European Patent and Trade Mark Attorneys, Calle de Velázquez, 3 – piso 3, 28001 Madrid, España (representante profesional) c o n t r a Casa D'aristi S.A. de C.V., 42 Tablaje 14187,

MODE | Decision 2335712 – SOCIETE D’APPLICATION DES METHODES MODERNES D’ECLAIRAGES ELECTRIQUES SAMMODE (Société anonyme) v. Scolmore (International) Limited

OPPOSITION n° B 2 335 712 Société d'application des Méthodes Modernes d'Eclairages Electriques Sammode (Société Anonyme), 24 Rue des Amandiers, 75020 Paris, France (opposante), représentée par Cabinet Plasseraud, 66, rue de la Chaussée d'Antin, 75440 Paris Cedex 09, France (mandataire agréé) c o n t r e Scolmore (International) Limited, 1 Scolmore park, Landsberg Lichfield Road Industrial Estate, Tamworth

O4 | Decision 2643321

OPPOSITION No B 2 643 321 O2 Worldwide Limited, 20 Air Street, London  W1B 5AN, United Kingdom (opponent), represented by Stobbs, Endurance House, Vision Park, Chivers Way, Cambridge  CB24 9ZR, United Kingdom (professional representative) a g a i n s t OXY4 GmbH, Strandstraße 15, 18233 Am Salzhaff, Germany (applicant) On 14/03/2017, the Opposition Division takes the following DECISION: 1.        Opposition

DEFLU | Decision 2670928

OPPOSITION No B 2 670 928 Dr. Werner Freyberg Chem. Fabrik Delitia Nachf. Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH, Werner-Freyberg-Str. 11, 69514 Laudenbach, Germany (opponent), represented by Claudia Bettendorf, Bierstadterstraße 7, 65189 Wiesbaden, Germany (professional representative) a g a i n s t XeLyse, 1/3 ul.Smulikovskiego str.of 1, 00389 Warsaw, Poland (applicant). On 14/03/2017, the Opposition Division takes the following DECISION: Opposition No B 2 670 928

O2L | Decision 2615204

OPPOSITION No B 2 615 204 O2 Worldwide Limited, 20 Air Street, London  W1B 5AN, United Kingdom (opponent), represented by Stobbs, Endurance House, Vision Park, Chivers Way, Cambridge  CB24 9ZR, United Kingdom (professional representative) a g a i n s t Hay Group Holdings Inc, 103 Foulk Road, Suite 202, Wilmington Delaware 19803 United States of America (applicant), represented

HOME SPARKS | Decision 2697129

OPPOSITION n° B 2 697 129 Philippe Starck, 22 rua Tenente Valadim, 2750-502 Cascais, Portugal (opposant) c o n t r e Xiaying Zhu, BLDG 15, #600 Jianghua Road, Pujiang Town, Minhang District, Shanghai, République Populaire de Chine (demanderesse), représentée par Nextmarq, 1 Rue Chabrier, 13100 Aix-en-Provence, France (mandataire agréé). Le 14/03/2017, la division d’opposition rend la présente DÉCISION: