Neoteck | Decision 2773748 – MAYCA PATRIMONIAL, S.L. v. Neoteck Technology Limited

OPPOSITION No B 2 773 748 Mayca Patrimonial, S.L., C/Jacinto Benavente Nº24, 5º Izda., 03360 El Campello, Alicante, Spain (opponent), represented by Patentes y Marcas A. Pomares, S.L., C/ José Ramos, 2 Entlo., 03203 Elche (Alicante), Spain (professional representative) a g a i n s t Neoteck Technology Limited, Unit 04, 7/F Bright Way Tower, 33 Mong Kok Road, Kowloon,

ACTIVE woman | Decision 2311291 – Asghar Adam Ali IBRAHIM v. BIO-SYNERGY LIMITED

OPPOSITION n° B 2 311 291 Asghar Adam Ali Ibrahim, Plot D4/10, Saif Zone Sharjah PO BOX 8548, Sharjah, Émirats arabes unis (opposant), représenté par Inlex Ip Expertise, Rambla de Mendez Núñez 21-23 / 5ºAB, 03002 Alicante, Espagne (mandataire agréé) c o n t r e Bio-Synergy Limited, 120 West Heath Road, London  NW3 7TX, Royaume-Uni, (demanderesse), représentée par

GO FRESH | Decision 2386251 – Privatbrunnen Tönissteiner Sprudel Dr. C. Kerstiens GmbH v. EFR B.V.

OPPOSITION No B 2 386 251 Privatbrunnen Tönissteiner Sprudel Dr. C. Kerstiens GmbH, Postfach 82, 56654 Brohl-Lützing, Germany (opponent), represented by Dompatent von Kreisler Selting Werner – Partnerschaft von Patentanwälten und Rechtsanwälten mbB, Deichmannhaus am Dom, Bahnhofsvorplatz 1, 50667 Köln, Germany (professional representative) a g a i n s t EFR B.V., Princenhagelaan 9, 4813 DA Breda, the Netherlands (applicant), represented

ATHLETIA | Decision 2366642 – Athleta (ITM) Inc. v. TM Film- u. Fernsehproduktions GmbH

OPPOSITION No B 2 366 642 Athleta (ITM) Inc., 2 Folsom Street, San Francisco, California, United States of America (opponent), represented by UNIT4 IP Rechtsanwälte, Jägerstraße 40, 70174 Stuttgart, Germany (professional representative) a g a i n s t TM Film- u. Fernsehproduktions GmbH, Luxemburger Str. 282 e, 50937 Köln, Germany (applicant), represented by Lentze Stopper Rechtsanwälte, Widenmayerstr. 28, 80538

ACUMEN | Decision 2361122 – NIIT Insurance Technologies Limited v. Adobe Systems Incorporated

OPPOSITION No B 2 361 122 NIIT Insurance Technologies Limited, 2nd Floor, 47 Mark Lane, London EC3R 7QQ United Kingdom (opponent), represented by Boehmert & Boehmert Anwaltspartnerschaft mbB – Patentanwälte Rechtsanwälte, Hollerallee 32, 28209 Bremen, Germany (professional representative) a g a i n s t Adobe Systems Incorporated, 345 Park Avenue, San Jose, California 95110, United States of America (applicant), represented

CAPRI CRUISE BOAT TRIPS & LEISURE SERVICES | Decision 2402033 – IN.PRO.DI – INGHIRAMI PRODUZIONE DISTRIBUZIONE S.p.A. v. Capri Cruise S.r.l.

OPPOSIZIONE N. B 2 402 033 In.Pro.Di – Inghirami Produzione Distribuzione S.p.A., Corso di Porta Romana 3 20122 Milano, Italia (opponente), rappresentata da Bugnion S.p.A., Via di Corticella 87, 40128 Bologna, Italia (rappresentante professionale) c o n t r o Capri Cruise S.r.l., Via Roma 53, 80073 Capri (NA), Italia (richiedente), rappresentata da Società Italiana Brevetti S.p.A, Piazza di

HI-DRY | Decision 2214958 – HUMEX, S.A. v. Multisorb Technologies, Inc.

OPPOSITION No B 2 214 958 Humex, S.A., Ctra. La Canonja, nave 4, 43110 La Canonja (Tarragona), Spain (opponent), represented by Olten Patentes y Marcas, C/Entença 332-334, 08029 Barcelona, Spain (professional representative) a g a i n s t Multisorb Technologies, Inc., 325 Harlem Road, Buffalo, New York 14224-1893, United States of America (applicant), represented by HGF Limited, 8th Floor, 140