SMART TEENS | Decision 2618687 – Société des Produits Nestlé S.A. v. SANTE A. Kowalski Sp.j.

OPPOSITION No B 2 618 687 Société des Produits Nestlé S.A., 1800 Vevey, Switzerland (opponent), represented by Harte-bavendamm Rechtsanwälte Partnerschaftsgesellschaft mbB, Am Sandtorkai 77, 20457 Hamburg, Germany (professional representative) a g a i n s t Sante A. Kowalski Sp.j., ul. Jagiellońska 55A, 03-301 Warszawa, Poland (applicant). On 07/04/2017, the Opposition Division takes the following DECISION: 1.        Opposition No B 2 618 687 is

Safaa | Decision 2683871 – Ismail Aktitiz v. United Sugar Company

OPPOSITION No B 2 683 871 Ismail Aktitiz, Robert-Geritzmann-Höfe 21, 45883 Gelsenkirchen, Germany (opponent), represented by Schneiders & Behrendt, Huestr. 23, 44787 Bochum, Germany (professional representative) a g a i n s t United Sugar Company, P.O. Box 23023, Jeddah 21426, Saudi Arabia (applicant), represented by Renaissance Solicitors LLP, 413 Hoe Street Walthamstow, London E17 9AP, United Kingdom (professional representative).

V VICTORIA | Decision 2704800

OPPOSITION No B 2 704 800 Mª Luisa Cristina Becerra Guibert, C/ del Edil Marina Olcina, 1, Playa San Juan, 03540 Alicante, Spain; and Calzados Nuevo Milenio, S.L., Pol.Ind. Tejerias, C/Los Huertos, s/n., Calahorra, Spain (opponents), represented by AB Asesores, Calle Bravo Murillo, 219 – 1º B, 28020 Madrid, Spain (professional representative) a g a i n s t

elasto PROMOTION FOR LIFE | Decision 2708462 – SAFILO-SOCIETA’ AZIONARIA FABBRICA ITALIANA LAVORAZIONE OCCHIALI – S.P.A. v. elasto form KG

OPPOSITION No B 2 708 462 Safilo-Societa’ Azionaria Fabbrica Italiana Lavorazione Occhiali – S.p.A., VII Strada, 15 Zona Industriale, 35129 Padova, Italy (opponent), represented by Cantaluppi & Partners S.r.L., Piazzetta Cappellato Pedrocchi 18, 35122 Padova, Italy (professional representative) a g a i n s t Elasto form KG, Franz-Sollfrank-Str. 6, 92237 Sulzbach-Rosenberg, Germany (applicant). On 07/04/2017, the Opposition Division takes the

life water by forevermore | Decision 2695065

OPPOSITION No B 2 695 065 South Beach Beverage Company Inc., 700 Anderson Hill Road, Purchase New York 10577, United States of America (opponent), represented by Bomhard IP S.L., C/Bilbao, 1, 5º, 03001 Alicante, Spain (professional representative) a g a i n s t UK & Partners Group Korlátolt Felelősségű Társaság, Csomád, Kossuth Lajos út 103, 2161 Hungary (applicant), represented by Szilágyi

Eleacc | Decision 2701673 – ELAC Electroacustic GmbH v. Guangzhou Miaoguang Commerce Limited

WIDERSPRUCH Nr. B 2 701 673 ELAC Electroacustic GmbH, Rendsburger Landstr. 215, 24113 Kiel, Deutschland (Widersprechende), vertreten durch Martin Landolf Lobemeier, Boehmert & Boehmert Anwaltspartnerschaft mbB – Patentanwälte Rechtsanwälte, Holtenauer Str. 57, 24105 Kiel, Deutschland (zugelassener Vertreter) g e g e n Mr.E-appliance Ltd, 221 Whittington Road, Bounds Green London, London City of N22 8YW, Vereinigtes Königreich, Guangzhou Miaoguang

MONARKA | Decision 2702978

OPOSICIÓN Nº B 2 702 978 Frutas y Verduras El Monarca, S.L.U., C/ Villa Conesa, 52, 30320 Fuente-Álamo (Murcia), España (parte oponente), representada por Lidermark Patentes y Marcas, C/Obispo Frutos, 1B, 2°-A, 30003 Murcia, España (representante profesional) c o n t r a Hortofrutícola Belcaire S.L., C/ Ausiàs March 1º – Bajo 5, 12520 Nules (Castellón), España y Exportaciones

clash of galaxy | Decision 2707449 – MSC Technologies Systems GmbH v. Shenzhen Original World Technology Co., Ltd

OPPOSITION No B 2 707 449 MSC Technologies Systems GmbH, Munzinger Straße 3, 79111 Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany (opponent), represented by Lorenz Seidler Gossel Rechtsanwälte Patentanwälte Partnerschaft mbB, Widenmayerstr. 23, 80538 München, Germany (professional representative) a g a i n s t Shenzhen Original World Technology Co. Ltd, Rm.201, Block A No.1 Qianwan First Road, Qianhai Shengang Cooperative Zone, Shenzhen Guangdong, People’s

Aristo AC Card | Decision 2708025 – SUAREZ H, S.A. v. Elmar Grandy

OPPOSITION No B 2 708 025 Suárez H, S.A., Gran Via, 40 Bis – 3º, 48009 Bilbao (Vizcaya), Spain (opponent), represented by S. Orlando Asesores Legales y en Propiedad Industrial, S.L., C/  Castelló, 20, 4ºD, 28001 Madrid, Spain (professional representative) a g a i n s t Elmar Grandy, Weidenweg 7, 85764 Oberschleißheim Germany (applicant), represented by Christoph Friedrich, Jahn Rothenburg

PAN AM | Decision 2710369 – Natascha Bonnermann v. LOSO

OPPOSITION No B 2 710 369 Natascha Bonnermann, Knaackstraße 28, 10405 Berlin, Germany (opponent), represented by Zimmermann & Partner Patentanwälte mbB, Josephspitalstr. 15, 80331 Munich, Germany (professional representative) a g a i n s t Loso Sp. z o.o., Sobieszyńska 21, 02-764 Warsaw, Poland (applicant). On 07/04/2017, the Opposition Division takes the following DECISION: 1.        Opposition No B 2 710 369 is partially upheld,